This is a caricature of my understanding of how humans make decisions and take actions. This is my contention that everything we do is subtly and unknowably influenced by various values we imbibe or create in our course through life. This is a broadening of this line of thought.
----------------
All of the following is with respect to the diagram below.
Sensory Input (1)
The first part of the diagram consists of the pair - noumenon (a) and phenomenon (b). Noumenon is specified as the thing in itself, that is reality as it is, independent of our senses or judgements. While phenomenon is our perception of the noumenon i.e. something which is presented to us by the senses.
For example, consider the statement ‘Cat is on the mat’. This statement is our judgement of our immediate environment. To see that this is only a judgement which may or may not correspond exactly to the world, we just need to understand that both the cat and mat are made of infinitesimal particles with huge voids in their structure and also that it may not be so recognised by someone who lacks linguistic expression like a child or another animal.
For a second example, consider a video clip of the quidditch game being played from the movie - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s stone. Now we know brooms don’t fly and certainly humans do not fly with the broom, so what is it that our eyes are telling us? Undoubtedly they see Harry Potter flying on the broom. But we are not fooled by this for we know it is just a visual effect or VFX which produces such an image.
So, we need to understand what has happened here - the world is presented to us in a certain way and then we use our judgement, using our value systems to interpret the world in a certain way. This is clearer in the second example but is not so apparent in the first one but the situation is similar in both the cases for in the first as well we need our faculty of language to make a judgement about the world.
Critical thinking (2)
Now, the phenomenon that is presented to us in this way is raw data which is processed in the next part of the diagram. This raw data of phenomenon is further judged by our value system to be either of relevance or not. If it is irrelevant then it is rejected and we do not consciously act on it - though we may register it through our unconscious faculty and this may affect future judgments but this does not happen in so clear a fashion as conscious processing. If it is relevant then it is considered as information (c) which can be defined as anything that is valuable to us and is of immediate concern.
This then forms the input for the next stage which is the intelligent (d) faculty of our brain. Here, the information aggregated over time is used along with our value system to make an intelligent conclusion.
This conclusion is presented to the institution (in case information is gathered by a group or a society, which acts as a unit) or to the individual (e), which again based on their moral judgments either decide to act or not to act.
Acting and forming values (3)
This brings us to our next stage where an action (f) is performed. These actions are the new noumenon for the world. Also, it is these actions, along with feedback from our environment, which reflect, reinforce and update our value systems (g) which are used as feedback in the original process.
Several notes are in order for the above simplified account of our voluntary actions:
The motivation to study this pattern was from the need to identify the source of our values. Normative ethics point towards norms which are reflected in our past actions and values as it comes out in our analysis. Descriptive ethics point towards belief systems which too come out from our system as beliefs inevitably lead to actions.
At every stage, we are using the feedback of our values to move onto the next stage. The chain can break at any one of the stages when the input to the stage is judged irrelevant.
This is a description of our voluntary acts and beliefs. It does not apply to involuntary actions where no thinking may be involved.
For most of the time, for individuals, these processes can be too fast to be registered as separate events as is shown here. But this seems to be the logical way a decision and a rational action is made. Also, in case of a group this may apply as is presented here more exactly.
For social units, the link provided here only works when the organising principle of the society is taken as ‘Intelligence is in cooperation”. Cooperation is embodied in the institutions which take actions on behalf of the society.
The axes - the vertical axis is considered the fast time axis, for here time is considered as continuous and changing from one moment to next at an incredible rate and hence the noumenon is getting renewed at the same pace at least while human thought processing is obviously very slow compared to this. So the horizontal is represented as the slow time axis.
Also note the role of feedback from the environment in this. For if an action is not liked by the environment it is punished in an informal or formal manner which is incorporated into our sense of values.
Action is any action performed by our active agencies including speech and writing.
I am presenting this as an informal discussion of the concepts here involved. The most significant aspect of this is that we are constantly using our value (moral or ethical) systems as feedback for actions whether we know this as such or not. This reasoning comes to the conclusion of the primacy of values in every human action.